mortemdei Says:

Jul 4, 2008 - lol, have you study biology? I mean, really study, in the university.

bigjerre Says:

Jul 4, 2008 - If you're going to try and insult me, just come out and say it.

mortemdei Says:

Jul 4, 2008 - You also have an error: mater=energy... so, he made it once, and then again????

bigjerre Says:

Jul 4, 2008 - I'm sure I said light=energy. If I did, I messed up. I don't recall saying that, but if I did, point out the time on the video, and I'll correct it.

kix4trix Says:

Jul 4, 2008 - I'll do it. You are fucking retarded. Shut the fuck up.

DisturbedbyDeth356 Says:

Jul 5, 2008 - ever heard of chromosone 2?

DisturbedbyDeth356 Says:

Jul 5, 2008 - you clearly dont know how oil is formed, how tectonics work (no flood), what pangea is, how light works or how plants work.

SaintCog Says:

Jul 5, 2008 - If Exxon say they find oil by looking for rocks millions of years old, I'm going to believe them because of their millions of dollars.How many YEC oil drilling companies do you know? Enjoy your love it/ hate it series more Jerre.

DerivedApe Says:

Jul 5, 2008 - how was that an insult? Wasn't that just question?

DerivedApe Says:

Jul 5, 2008 - You claim that evidence supporting evolution is just speculation yet you don't present any evidence for your view. Infact all you do is speculate, maybe this and maybe that and puff the magic happens. I can't see how you consider those as valid arguments in support of your view.

Eldelacuchuca Says:

Jul 5, 2008 - If there was ligth and energy before there was a Sun, then why in the world did your god create a Sun for? I think even your dog disagrees with you, hehe (joke).

noelplum99 Says:

Jul 5, 2008 - The 99% thing is the least of your worries Jerry. You should look into synonymour genetic variants, pseudogenes and genetic retrovirus distribution; these things require a mugh higher level of creationist 'how it could have been' maneuvering to explain. I recommend Sean B Carrolls 'the making of the fittest' book or for a brief resume my video here on youtube v=oaFjs_CTtqA

mortemdei Says:

Jul 5, 2008 - I know you said that, I was only remembering you that mater=energy (remember e=mc^2?). Then, why did he made mater-energy more than once?

mortemdei Says:

Jul 5, 2008 - I wasn't insulting you... I was asking you. Look the diference: question= have you been in the university, do you have a title? insult: you motherfucker creationist, fuck you, fuck god, fuck religion. You're just a fat asshole. See? it's quite diferent.

DNAunion Says:

Jul 21, 2008 - Years ago, when DNA hybridization was used, the chimp and human genomes were found to be ~98.4% identical. That is the oldest and crudest comparison. Later, when a large region containing several protein-coding genes was directly compared, the human & chimp sequences were about 99.4% identical. Finally, when whole-genome comparisons between chimps and humans were done, the aligned sequence identity was ~96% (when indels are counted) and ~99% (when indels are not counted).

DNAunion Says:

Jul 21, 2008 - The "logic" of "Biochemical similarity is necessary for us to have food" is retarded. It puts NATURAL restrictions on God. God is supposed to be all-powerful etc. Surely He could have made us humans out of silicates (as the Book of Genesis wrongly states) and made us able to obtain nutrition from, say, water - God is, afterall, supposed to be the master of nature, not the other way around.

DNAunion Says:

Jul 21, 2008 - 1) You said that we don't know how many base pairs there are in the chimp genome. What??? Back in 2005 scientists found that the chimp genome has about 2.8 billion base pairs. 2) You said that the chimp genome has not yet been sequenced. What? It was sequenced back in 2005. Your video was posted on July 4 of 2008: your sources are several years out of date. About time you got up to speed, Jr.

DNAunion Says:

Jul 21, 2008 - You asserted that the millions of base pairs differences between humans and chimps is too big for evolution. There are many problems with that "logic": for example, it fails to consider (1) genetic hitchiking, (2) the probable genetic bottleneck in human history (~75 KYA), (3) each indel mutation counting, on average, as 36 nucleotide differences, and (4) most mutations being neutral.

DNAunion Says:

Jul 21, 2008 - Your argument overlook the evidence of common ancestry presented by shared pseudogenes. Humans & chimps share several pseudogenes that also share the very same disabling mutations: 1 example is the psi-beta 1 pseudogene. These facts make perfect sense in light of common descent - MACROevolution - but they don't make sense for ID: it makes no sense for an Intelligent Designer to create non-functional genes, let alone ones that have the very same disablements in both humans and chimps.

Drekoguk Says:

Jul 22, 2008 - I love Young Earth Creationists. They provide an easy answer to the question why religion is so detrimental to society. This is why religion is so bad! You get people believing the world is 6000 years old, that a 600 year old man saved 2 of every terrestrial species from a global flood by gathering them into a single boat 4500 years ago and that T-rexes ate vegetables just because some Holy Book says so. And this is just one of the few problems wrong with religion.

ConstantlyQuestion Says:

Jul 24, 2008 - "Homology is not an absolute indication of common ancestry." The definition of homology REQUIRES that homologous structures be from the same ancestor, otherwise they are called ANALOGOUS. You fail at understanding the meaning of the word, you fail before you get a chance to fail.

bigore1979 Says:

Aug 17, 2008 - I guess you've heard of the chromosome II Search for ken miller and chromosome II. Look also for ERV's, it's goodbye for creation.