Added: Oct 9, 2008
From: TheJaredJammer
Duration: 9:0
Notoriously dishonest Darwinist Ken Miller's arguments are ripped to shreds in this riveting demonstration. Watch as the case for Intelligent Design grows stronger as every claim against I.D. is thoroughly debunked by scientific evidence. For example, Ken Miller's argument that the bacterial flagellum evolved from the Type III Secretion System... "The best current molecular evidence, however, points to the TTSS as evolving from the flagellum and not vice versa (Nguyen et al. 2000)....Ken Miller has nothing more than the TTSS to point to as a possible evolutionary precursor. Behe and the ID community have therefore successfully shown that Darwinists don't have a clue how the bacterial flagellum might have arisen." Source: http://www.arn.org/docs2/news/wd_still_spinning.htm More on Ken Miller's dangerous level of dishonesty.... http://www.uncommondescent.com/expelled/kenneth-miller-darwins-bs-artist/ http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/ken-miller-the-closet-id-supporter-backpedals-and-dissembles/ http://www.uncommondescent.com/legal/ken-miller-caught-making-factually-incorrect-statements-under-oath/ http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/idea-co-founder-disembowels-ken-millers-strawman/ http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/the-collapse-of-ken-miller/ http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/ken-miller-up-to-his-old-tricks/ http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/ken-miller-may-face-more-embarrassing-facts-behes-dbb-vindicated/ http://www.arn.org/docs2/news/wd_still_spinning.htm More on the flagellum..... http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/all-flagellar-genes-derive-from-a-single-gene/ http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/spin-flagellum-spin/ http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/nick-matzkes-ttss-to-flagellum-evolutionary-narrative-refuted/
Channel: Tech
Tags: atheism behe biology darwin dawkins dembski design dover evolution expelled id intelligent irreducible politics science
Rating: 5.00 (2 ratings) Views: 138 Comments:
